<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pardon my language but fuckyourogers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ramsayramsay.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/pardon-my-language-but-fuckyourogers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ramsayramsay.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/pardon-my-language-but-fuckyourogers/</link>
	<description>Megan Ramsay's Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:53:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://ramsayramsay.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/pardon-my-language-but-fuckyourogers/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ramsayramsay.wordpress.com/?p=66#comment-126</guid>
		<description>I don’t think this dislike/anger should be saved for just one carrier.  While Rogers is doing the iPhone disaster (re: withholding information and lack of PR on one of the most anticipated product to the Canadian market place in years) main stream media is ignoring all the other blunders that Bell and Telus are doing.

Bell, Telus to charge for incoming text messages.

Here are a few comments from other blogs on this subject:

&quot;This charge is unbelievable. If someone sends me &quot;spam&quot; on my Bell phone, I have to pay for it? I made the mistake of giving my cellphone number to a car rental agency and now I get spam text messages,&quot; a Bell customer ranted on a Canadian technology blog.

&quot;I actually work for Bell and I think this incoming text messages being charged is bogus!&quot; posted another.

So in the end, which carrier isn’t going to screw you over in the Canadian market place?? Or could the real answer to this be deregulation??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think this dislike/anger should be saved for just one carrier.  While Rogers is doing the iPhone disaster (re: withholding information and lack of PR on one of the most anticipated product to the Canadian market place in years) main stream media is ignoring all the other blunders that Bell and Telus are doing.</p>
<p>Bell, Telus to charge for incoming text messages.</p>
<p>Here are a few comments from other blogs on this subject:</p>
<p>&#8220;This charge is unbelievable. If someone sends me &#8220;spam&#8221; on my Bell phone, I have to pay for it? I made the mistake of giving my cellphone number to a car rental agency and now I get spam text messages,&#8221; a Bell customer ranted on a Canadian technology blog.</p>
<p>&#8220;I actually work for Bell and I think this incoming text messages being charged is bogus!&#8221; posted another.</p>
<p>So in the end, which carrier isn’t going to screw you over in the Canadian market place?? Or could the real answer to this be deregulation??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
